Team Website Scoresheet

Judges will review team websites for content, usability and design using the website guidelines.

Question Title

* What is your first and last name?

Question Title

* What RoboSub team are you judging?

____________________________________________________________________________________

Question Title

* Team Information
(30 points)

Rubric:

Teams must maintain a website that reflects their current competition team, including team information (name and team contact information), team member information (name, picture, contact information) and a list of sponsors with logos.

Exceptional (21-30): Team website includes team name and contact information, team member information (name, picture, contact information), and a list of sponsors with logos.

Excellent (11-20): Team website provides a brief introduction on the team, team members and sponsors.

Good (6-10): Team website provides a mention of the team and team members.

Fair (1-5): Team website mentions the team.

Question Title

* Judge Comments for the Team
Team Information

Question Title

* Unmanned Vehicle Design Documentation
(50 points)

Rubric:

Teams must maintain a website documenting the development of their vehicle. Layout and contents of the website are left for the teams to develop; however, the website should include media (pictures, videos, etc.) taken during development and testing. Teams are encouraged to build an archive of previous vehicles and design reports, if applicable.

Exceptional (36-50): Vehicle development and testing process is thoroughly documented with instructional and informative media and historical recording.
---Could include: photographs, diagrams, videos, procedures (text + images), design documentation (text + images + video), blogs for historical records.

Excellent (21-35): Vehicle development and testing process is briefly documented.

Good (6-20): Few pictures or videos of the vehicle, but no historical, instructional or informative documentation.

Fair (1-5): Vehicle is mentioned but no documentation or visuals provided.

Question Title

* Judge Comments for the Team
ASV Design Documentation

Question Title

* Website Quality
(50 points)

Rubric:

Layout and contents of the website are left for the teams to develop. Through use of visuals and text, the website showcases the team and vehicle development in an organized and cohesive manner.

Exceptional (41-50): Website places a heavy emphasis on human factors. Layout is visually appealing, easily maneuverable, and does an excellent job of drawing user's attention to relevant content.

Excellent (31-40): Website considers some user experience. Layout and maneuverability do a good job of drawing user’s attention.

Great (21-30): Layout, content and design is easily maneuvered and understood in many ways.

Good (11-20): Layout and/or design makes it difficult to find information.

Fair (1-10): Website is busy and difficult to read; lacking information.

Question Title

* Judge Comments for the Team
Website Quality

____________________________________________________________________________________

Question Title

* Any additional comments for the team?

These comments will be shared with the RoboSub team you are evaluating.

Question Title

* Any comments for RoboNation?

These comments will only be shared with RoboNation.
Thank you for your evaluation!

Ready to submit? Click the blue button below.

All evaluations are due on July 25.

T